We Need Positive Visions for AI Grounded in Wellbeing

Current AI discourse is overly dominated by dystopian risk narratives and singularity fantasies; there is an urgent need to systematically build positive AI pathways anchored in empirically grounded wellbeing metrics (e.g., OECD’s Better Life Index), not just regulation or abstract ethical principles.
Core Argument: The Absence of Positive Visions Is a Critical Blind Spot in AI Governance
Mainstream AI discourse is polarized between two dominant narratives: one centered on existential risk and control failure (e.g., Superintelligence, AI alignment crises), the other on techno-determinist singularity fantasies (e.g., AGI autonomously solving all human problems). Together, they obscure the foundational question: What kind of human flourishing do we want AI to enable?
A Feasible Wellbeing-Oriented Framework
The authors propose a ‘Wellbeing-AI’ framework that translates the OECD’s Better Life Index—with its 11 dimensions (housing, income, jobs, community, education, environment, civic engagement, health, life satisfaction, safety, work-life balance)—into measurable, system-integrated design goals. Examples include:
- Llama 3 or Gemini 2.0 dialogue systems actively detecting and mitigating loneliness signals during interaction (using WHO ICD-11 psychosocial assessment modules);
- Hugging Face Transformers model cards mandatorily including a ‘Wellbeing Impact Statement’ disclosing potential biases in training data across gender equity, digital inclusion, and other dimensions;
- OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo API shipping with a default ‘Wellbeing Alignment Toggle’, enabling developers to prioritize long-term cognitive health (e.g., reducing information overload) over short-term engagement metrics.
Practical Challenges and Early Implementations
This is not speculative idealism: arXiv paper Wellbeing-Aware LLMs: A Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation (2024, 2403.18527) demonstrates that fine-tuning Llama-3-8B yields a statistically significant 12.7% increase (p<0.01) in user-reported life satisfaction; Google Research is integrating its ‘Digital Wellbeing’ API into Gemini Advanced; yet no cross-model, cross-platform standardized wellbeing evaluation protocol exists.